Bring Your Own Demise [INFOGRAPHIC]

March 6, 2013

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) is certainly not new, but its effects on security and employee behavior are still largely undetermined.  To quantify the impact of personal devices in corporate settings, Varonis conducted a short survey and compiled the results in a new research report.

The results may surprise you — more than half of respondents reported someone in their companylost a device with important company data on it, and 22% of lost devices had security implications for the company.  Moreover, 86% of employees admit to being “device obsessed,” working on their mobile device around the clock.

Enjoy, share, embed our infographic and download the full report to learn which data protection activities truly matter.

Bring Your Own Demise: A Report of the Impact of BYOD


Trade Secret Misappropriation: When An Insider Takes Your Trade Secrets With Them

February 12, 2013

Raymond Law Group LLC‘s Stephen G. Troiano recently had an article, Trade Secret Misappropriation: When An Insider Takes Your Trade Secrets With Them, featured in The National Law Review:

While companies are often focused on outsider risks such as breach of their systems through a stolen laptop or hacking, often the biggest risk is from insiders themselves. Such problems of access management with existing employees, independent contractors and other persons are as much a threat to proprietary information as threats from outside sources.

In any industry dominated by two main players there will be intense competition for an advantage. Advanced Micro Devices and Nvida dominate the graphics card market. They put out competing models of graphics cards at similar price points. When played by the rules, such competition is beneficial for both the industry and consumers.

AMD has sued four former employees for allegedly taking “sensitive” documents when they left to work for Nvidia. In its complaint, filed in the 1st Circuit District Court of Massachusetts, AMD claims this is “an extraordinary case of trade secret transfer/misappropriation and strategic employee solicitation.” Allegedly, forensically recovered data show that when the AMD employees left in July of 2012 they transferred thousands of files to external hard drives that they then took with them. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Feldstein et al, No. 4:2013cv40007 (1st Cir. 2013).

On January 14, 2013 the District Court of Massachusetts granted AMD’s ex-parte temporary restraining order finding AMD would suffer immediate and irreparable injury if the Court did not issue the TRO. The TRO required the AMD employees to immediately provide their computers and storage devices for forensic evaluation and to refrain from using or disclosing any AMD confidential information.

The employees did not have a non-compete contract. Instead the complaint is centered on an allegation of misappropriation of trade secrets. While both AMD and Nvidia are extremely competitive in the consumer discrete gpu market involving PC gaming enthusiasts, there are rumors that AMD managed to secure their hardware to be placed in both forthcoming next-generation consoles, Sony PlayStation 4 and Microsoft Xbox 720. AMD’s TRO and ultimate goal of the suit may therefore be to preclude any of their proprietary technology from being used by its former employees to assist Nvidia in the future.

The law does protect companies and individuals such as AMD from having their trade secrets misappropriated. The AMD case has only recently been filed and therefore it is unclear what the response from the employees will be. What is clear is how fast AMD was able to move to deal with such a potential insider threat. Companies need to be aware of who has access to what data and for how long. Therefore, in the event of a breach, whether internal or external, companies can move quickly to isolate and identify the breach and take steps such as litigation to ensure their proprietary information is protected.

© 2013 by Raymond Law Group LLC


Biggest BYOD challenge: Protecting private data

November 29, 2012

The dirty secret of BYOD is that employees are giving up their personal privacy in exchange for the convenience of choosing their own phone and conducting life on a single device.

It’s all well and good to have that freedom, but there are ways to balance employee personal privacy with the needs of the company says, Apperian’s CTO Carlos Montero-Luque.

Montero-Luque says employees face two main challenges when they accept the BYOD bargain, and they might not even realize it.

New Trend In BYOD Security: Contain The Data, Not The Device.
Sign up for CITEworld’s InCITE newsletter — delivered weekly.

“The first is whether or not they are willing to give the company full control of their device. By allowing the company/IT department full control of their device, they’re giving permission for those departments to view their personal content, access it, delete it, or even become involved in any legal matters (e.g., discovery in a lawsuit),” Montero-Luque explained.

The second and less obvious concern is that the controls the company puts on your device could actually make the experience worse by slowing down the phone or reducing battery life. “Employees want to experience the device they bought in the same way they expect even while they are at work,” Montero-Luque said.

Given these limitations, why do employees even want to bring their own devices? He says it’s not all that complicated, actually.

“Consumers feel the devices they can choose from are better than those enterprises offer to them. Users are more comfortable with the devices they purchased, as they provide an overall better experience with perks such as the ability to upgrade software and apps as they becomes available.”

Employers also face a set of challenges when they allow employees to choose their own devices. Most obviously, there is the issue of how to manage a myriad of devices with different software and operating systems without compromising private information on the device. If you need to remotely wipe enterprise content, for example, there is no reason you should have to wipe out the photos, address book and personal texting history at the same time.

One way to solve this dilemma for both parties is to compartmentalize the enterprise data.

“Compartmentalizing enterprise data tries to solve BYOD issues for both companies and their employees by creating two separate personas. A corporate persona, including all corporate content, and a consumer persona, including all personal content,” Montero-Luque said.

He says it’s while it’s a step in the right direction, this approach creates two separate machines within a single device. He says this division of labor comes with the same issues you have when you carry two phones. You eliminate one of the devices, but you are essentially running two anyway, creating a similar problem by having to switch between the two personas.

He says instead of trying to create two devices in one, the compartmentalization should be done at the individual corporate item, ap,p or document level. This way the compartmentalization is invisible as possible to the user, but still effectively secures access and content.

“Instead of this traditional solution, the goal ought to be to allow employees to access their corporate content in the same way as they would access their personal content, with the same user experience and device capabilities, while at the same time, seamless to the user, providing the full level of security, privacy, access control, and auditing capabilities that remain, more than ever, absolute requirements for IT departments as the guardians of corporate assets and data.”

This approach, which not coincidentally is how Apperian helps manage BYOD devices, provides a single device with one user experience instead of two separate ones. It also enables the company to control the device at the back end and eliminate obsolete documents or to shut off access to enterprise content when an employee leaves the company or loses the device.

More specifically, Apperian uses an enterprise app store where employees can access sanctioned enterprise apps. “Because we enable the delivery of corporate assets to BYOD devices via an enterprise app store, we track every app and content delivered and this enables the administrator to track and erase each specific corporate asset from the device without touching personal apps and data,” Montero-Luque explained.

In the end there are a number of approaches that companies can take to protect data, but both employer and employees should understand the issues that come with BYOD — and should work together to find the best approach for your organization.

 

Thanks to Ron Miller is a freelance technology journalist, blogger, FierceContentManagement editor, and contributing editor at EContent Magazine Read Ron’s bio

On Employee Data Theft

October 29, 2012

Last week Zynga, the social gaming company famous for Farmville and Cityville, filed a lawsuit against former employee Alan Patmore for making off with 763 documents—including business plans and other intellectual property—and  bringing them to competitor Kixeye.  Patmore doesn’t deny the claim.

It hasn’t been confirmed exactly how Zynga discovered that Patmore nabbed the documents, but I wonder if software, not a human, sounded the alarm.

Sadly, this kind of unethical behavior happens more frequently than you’d think.  According to Cyber-Ark’s 2012 global Trust, Security and Passwords Survey, slightly less than half of respondents admitted that if they were fired today, they would pocket proprietary data – even knowing it wasn’t allowed.

Other findings from the survey:

  • 45% said they have access to information that is not relevant to their role
  • 42% indicated they have used admin credentials to access information that was marked confidential
  • 55% believe competitors have obtained their company’s  intellectual property

The Zynga case underscores organizations’ need to ensure that only the right users have access to the right data at all times, access is monitored, and abuse is flagged.

For every person who is caught stealing intellectual property from an employer, how many fly under the radar?  Insider threats are something organizations need to take seriously.

Want to find out if suspicious behavior is occurring in your environment?  We’ll show you.


How Executives Are Using Social Media Social Plus One

April 2, 2012

The time constraints on today’s executives are more numerous than ever before. Between the economic downturn, ever-changing industry regulations, fast-moving information and simple day-to-day management tasks, corporate executives are trapped in the virtual jail cell that is today’s business climate. The unintended result of executive “information-imprisonment” is a workplace where they may have little insight into employee morale, culture, and general goings-on during the workday.


Managing Remote Working Risks

March 16, 2012

A new practice guide has been published by the UK Centre for Protection of National Infrastructure; the guide provides guidance on personnel security practice for remote working on a regular or permanent basis. It outlines how remote working can bring benefits for both employers and employees; however, remote working introduces additional security risks which, if left unchecked, may lead to serious consequences, such as an important corporate data loss.

The new guide aims to inform employers about the personnel security vulnerabilities of remote working and provide practical guidance on reducing these risks. Risks can be reduced by introducing effective policies and procedures.

Remote working, whether it is working from home, on the move or in clients or satellite offices, is becoming even more commonplace, growing to an estimated 20 percent of the working population (over 6.5 million people) in 2012.

To obtain the guide, please visit the Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure (CPNI) to learn more about the facilities, systems, sites and networks necessary for the delivery of essential services across a number of sectors.

Thanks to Asigra


C24 and 2011

January 10, 2011

C24 had a fantastic 2010 with the company growing from 5 to 13 people and new clients being added almost monthly. The projected figures for 2011 will see the company go from strength to strength as we have added a number of experienced sales people and increased the depth of our product portfolio.

We recognise that we are in a competitive environment and that a number of our hosting and application delivery solutions that we offer are gradually becoming more commoditised, however when clients work with C24 it is not usually just about hosting an application it is about building their business with an organisation that cares about them. We recently received a great review on linkedin from a company that we regularly work with the following is the comments made: 

” WIthout a shadow of doubt C24 are experts in integration. I’ve known them to start a project cut over at midnight Friday and the main people then not take a break till Monday morning to insure a seamless transfer for a client. Going beyond the call of duty is standard for C24, the only surprise I ever get from them is the occasional, ‘we just can’t do it’ as it’s such a rare answer from them. Highly recommended company, people and processes.”  Brett Rowe, Sales & Marketing Director at TFM Networks Ltd Reading, United Kingdom.

Organisations do go to larger hosting companies and sometimes get great service, however if you are looking at hosting or would just like to seek some advice we would be more than happy to sit down with you and discuss your needs and give you an honest experienced recommendation.

Thanks for reading this blog and please visit again soon as we try to update at least 2/3 times a week with blogs based around technology that we are interested in. See you soon.


C24 Culture

November 29, 2010

Some of the C24 team went out Friday night for a meal, I could say for team strategy but it was more about building on already strong relationships. To people who do not know C24 the business was first created by Paul Hemming,over the next 12 months a number of people have come together to create a business that has a vision of delivering business applications at speed for the SME marketplace.

There are a number of businesses; such as Zappos, that grab international headlines for their business culture and the relationships they have with clients, but there businesses across the UK that also have fantastic cultures and great relationships with clients. C24 are in my opinion one such company, the business has grown from strength to strength which is shown not only in turnover and profit but also in the way the C24 team have come together to offer fantastic business solutions. The C24 way of working has also shown clients that there are businesses that do really care about relationships and will bend over backwards to make things happen.

There are a number of core values that are driving our business:

  • Embrace and drive and change from within
  • Have fun and enjoy your C24 time maybe have a different way of thinking
  • Deliver fantastic customer service
  • Be passionate and love what we do
  • Be positive about each other
  • Be honest and humble

Please follow us via this blog so that you can see what C24 are up to but also you could also see some of the technologies that we are interested in.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 746 other followers