Shifts in Retail Demand New Analytics

October 15, 2012

Our benchmark research into retail analytics says that only 34 percent of retail companies are satisfied with the process they currently use to create analytics. That’s a 10 percent lower satisfaction score than we found for all industries combined. The dissatisfaction is being driven by underperforming technology that cannot keep up with the dramatic changes that are occurring in the retail industry. Retail analytics lag those in the broader business world, with 71 percent still using spreadsheets as their primary analysis tool. This is significantly higher than other industries and shows the immaturity in the field of retail analytics.

While in the past retailers did not need to be on the cutting edge of analytics, dramatic changes occurring in retail are driving a new analytics imperative:

Manufacturers are forming direct relationships with consumers through communities and e-commerce. These relationships can extend into the store and influence buyers at the point of purchase.  This “pull-through” strategy increases the power and brand equity of the supplier while decreasing the position strength of the retailer. This dynamic is evidenced by JC Penney, which positions itself as a storefront for an entire portfolio of supplier brands. Whereas before the retailer owned the relationship with the consumer, the relationship is now shared between the retailer and its suppliers.

What this means for retail analytics: Our benchmark research shows retail has lagged behind other businesses with respect to analytics. Given the new co-opitition environment with suppliers, retailers must use analytics to compete. Their decreasing brand equity means that they need analytics not just for brand strategy and planning, but also in tactical areas such as merchandising and promotional management. At the same time, retailers are working with ever-increasing amounts of data that is often shared throughout the supply chain to build business cases and to enrich customer experience, and that data is ripe for analysis in service to business goals.

E-commerce is driving a convergence of offline and online retail consumer behavior, forcing change to a historically inert retail analytics culture. As we’ve all heard by now, online retailers such as Amazon threaten the business models of showroom retailers. Some old-line companies are dealing with the change by taking an “if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em” approach. Traditional brick-and-mortar company Walgreens, for instance, acquired Drugstore.com and put kiosks in its stores to let customers order out-of-stock items immediately at the same price. However, online retailers, instead of looking to move into a brick-and-mortar environment, are driving their business model back into the data center and forward onto mobile devices. Amazon, for instance, offers Amazon Web Services and Kindle tablet.

What this means for retail analytics: There has historically been a wall between the .com area of a company and the rest of the organization. Companies did mystery shopping to do price checks in physical trade areas and bots to do the same thing over the Internet. Now companies such as Sears are investing heavily to gain full digital transparency into the supply chain so that they can change pricing on the fly – that is, it may choose to undercut a competitor on a specific SKU, then when its system finds a lack of inventory among competitors for the item, it can automatically increase its price and its margin. Eventually the entire industry, including midtier retailers, will have to focus on how analytics can improve their business.

Retailers are moving the focus of their strategy away from customer acquisition and toward customer retention. We see this change of focus both on the brick-and-mortar side, where loyalty card programs are becoming ubiquitous, and online via key technology enablers such as Google, whose I/O 2012 conference focused on the shift from online customer acquisition to online customer retention.

What this means for retail analytics: As data proliferates, businesses gain the ability to look more closely at how individuals contribute to a company’s revenue and profit. Traditional RFM and attribution approaches are becoming more precise as we move away from aggregate models and begin to look at particular consumer behavior. Analytics can help pinpoint changes in behavior that matter, and more importantly, indicate what organizations can do to retain desired customers or expand share-of-wallet. In addition, software to improve the customer experience within the context of a site visit is becoming more important. This sort of analytics, which might be called a type of online ethnography, is a powerful tool for improving the customer experience and increasing the stickiness of a retailer’s site.

In sum, our research on retail analytics shows that outdated technological and analytical approaches still dominate the retail industry. At the same time, changes in the industry are forcing companies to rethink their strategies, and many companies are addressing these challenges by leveraging analytics to attract and retain the most valued customers. For large firms, the stakes are extremely high, and the decisions around how to implement this strategy can determine not just profitability but potentially their future existence. Retail organizations need to consider investments into new approaches for getting access to analytics. For example, analytics provided via cloud computing and software as a service are becoming more pervasive help ensure they meet the capabilities and needs of business roles. Such approaches are a step function above the excel based environments that many retailers are living in today.

thanks to http://tonycosentino.ventanaresearch.com/2012/10/12/shifts-in-retail-demand-new-analytics/

 


The Nike+ House of Innovation Experience

August 2, 2012

It’s summer. The London Olympics are on and Selfridges are hosting Nike’s House of Innovation. What’s the Nike House of Innovation? Well, it’s a very cool brand experience that is made up of a handful of challenges, exhibitions and environments that converge the physical and digital retail space for “everyday athletes” as they compete against each other and interact with the environment filled with some of Nike’s most innovative products and technologies. Seriously cool…

Thanks to www.digitalbuzzblog.com


How to Retain Your Best Customers

May 1, 2012

Just spotted this blog reference retaining your best customers and thought it provided some good insight.
 
Most CPG marketing budgets allocate spending between  three “buckets”: Trade Marketing, Advertising (TV and  Print), and Consumer Promotion. But Michael Schiff, a loyalty marketing consultant, proposes an alternative viewpoint using just two categories: Acquisition and Retention. Acquisition is spending directly aimed at gaining trial of your brand by consumers who have never tried it before. Retention is spending directly aimed at stemming the inevitable attrition of current buyers.

“The simple act of recasting a budget can be a real eye-opener,” said Schiff, managing director of Partners In Loyalty Marketing (www.PartnersILM.com). “For most brands, it shows that upwards of 85% of their marketing spending is focused on Acquisition.”

Parsing retention spending into dollars focused against Heavy Buyers vs. Mediums and Lights also reveals valuable lessons. For most brands, Heavies (that is, the top 25% of buyers) control 60-75% of sales. In fact, the top 5% or the SuperHeavies can control 20-30% of dollars. In contrast, the bottom 50% of buyers typically account for 6-12% of sales. Many of these Lights are one-time buyers. Most brands spend just a tiny fraction, if at all, of their total budget on Heavy Buyer retention; the vast majority of retention spending is aimed at trying to “up-sell” Mediums and Lights, typically a very inefficient use of limited marketing dollars.

“For most brands, fully half of the franchise (that is, Lights) is MIA for most of the year,” says Schiff. “It makes us feel good to count them in the franchise, but the reality is they’re a distraction from the business of meeting the needs of consumers that count. Spending against retaining or up-selling Lights (and even Mediums) is generally very ineffective. When it does work, you’ve essentially ‘rented a share point’ and in many cases eroded brand equity by excessive dealing. Yet, almost every brand we’ve looked at is chasing new buyers and giving short-shrift to the Heavies that truly are the core of its business.”

While Schiff believes the balance between Retention and Acquisition spending can be narrowed, he doesn’t believe it should ever be 50/50. “Acquisition is an investment spend. It will always cost more to capture a new buyer than retain an existing one. Ignoring one comes at the expense of the other.”

According to Schiff, 10-20% of Heavy buyers of a brand on a year-over-year basis leave the franchise altogether. Another 15-30% “downsize” their buy-rate. Hence, rather than having a “lock” on its Heavy Buyers, most brands have a major retention issue.

“The reason brands give short-shrift to spending against Heavy buyer retention,” he explains, “is because they mistakenly believe their buyers – especially Heavies – are way more loyal than they really are. The truth is you’re in a daily hand-to-hand battle to hold on to the 25% of buyers that drive your business. Except in a few categories, even the SuperHeavies do not translate into SuperLoyals.”

Retention marketing is not easy. The skew of most budgets toward acquisition spending means that brand managers are primarily taught acquisition skills. Most “relationship marketing” programs fail because they try to build a closer relationship with the Heavies using the same messaging, offers and creative that the brand uses to acquire totally new consumers.

Schiff recommends employing some simple and effective strategies for building relationships. It’s key to understand that Heavies understand your brand benefits, point of difference and effectiveness. You have equity with them, so speaking to them in “acquisition mode” is both condescending and a waste of time. Instead, effective relationship communication focuses on allowing Heavy buyers to discover information that validates their pre-existing beliefs about the efficacy and good qualities of the brand.

“When you look at brand marketing budgets through the lens of Acquisition and Retention, what you see is that most brand spending is focused on the lowest yielding activities and consumer segments,” he says. “Brands winning in today’s marketplace are increasingly making Heavy Buyer retention an important and consistent part of their marketing mix, and growing their expertise at creating true relationship-building communications.”

This essay was written by Michael Schiff, managing partner of Partners In Loyalty Marketing, a Chicago-based consultancy that specializes in program strategy, optimization, and evaluation for CPG, Rx, and OTC companies. For more information: www.PartnersILM.com.

C24 the company you can depend on.

July 25, 2011

Over the last 24 months C24 has only ‘lost’ one client and that was due to them going into administration. Everybody knows that the last 18 months and potentially the next have been the worst trading conditions we have seen in decades. However C24 have grown from strength to strength in terms of revenue, profit, customer acquisition and customer retention.

And you may ask the reason?

Well as an organisation we have built on a number of strengths but the main one is that we are dependable. One client stated “we are buying peace of mind. I could give it to someone cheaper, and then either manage it myself or have to worry they might fail. I can trust C24 to take care of it and I can then focus on what matters most to my business.”  This is just one client but you could ask anyone of one of our clients and we believe that they would say the same.

Dependability is sadly lacking in service industries and especially in ours, however it is not just a one way street. We have to make sure that our employees are dependable and as important our suppliers, it only takes a few issues and all of a sudden we could have a problem.  

We always attempt to do what we have promised, however life is hard and we have to work in situations that sometimes are very taxing, so we always look to face any issues head on and tell our clients at any stage if we believe there are going to be problems, which thankfully is relatively rare.

There are other areas within a business that are important, creativity, knowledge, pricing etc but we believe that the success of C24 is a combination of these plus dependability because without this we would be having to replace lost clients continuously.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 753 other followers