Big Data Promotes a Culture of Data-Informed Decision Making and Adaptive Marketing – Antony Young-Mindshare

March 15, 2013

Big Data is quickly being catapulted to the top of Marketing’s agenda, but it remains a challenge for many companies in preparing for this shift. According to a survey conducted by IBM, less than half of CMO’s feel prepared to cope with this increasing amount of marketing data over the next 5 years, with the data explosion cited as their #1 headache. The problem isn’t obtaining data, it’s figuring out how to turn it into marketing magic. I’m seeing a growing list of exceptional cases of marketer’s shifting their organizations to adopt a higher level of data-informed decision making, often with astonishing results.

It’s not so much big data, but smart data used at scale

Last week, I had dinner with Joe Rospars, founding partner at Blue State Digital, who served as Obama’s Chief Digital Strategist for his 2008 and 2012 campaigns, and asked him about big data. He responded, their approach “wasn’t so much big data, but smart data used at scale.” To win this election, they needed to get very granular in their targeting. By extracting voter files and collecting information via the tens of thousands of polling calls made to homes every night, they were able to identify by household individual voter likelihood, and then determine the communications they needed to deliver.

The Obama campaign expertly targeted via online advertising, email, door to door and phone canvassing very personalized messaging. They cleverly extended this strategy via social media. Nearly a million supporters that ‘liked’ the Obama 2012 page also allowed access to their profile data via Facebook Connect. This enabled Obama’s people to identify their Facebook friends in battleground States, cross tabulate with their own databases, which they then asked supporters to email or even personally call their friends that fit likely Obama voter profiles, to remind them to register or vote early.

Data is the engine for Adaptive Marketing

Data is allowing brands to move quicker and more decisively to gain a market advantage by dynamically informing their messaging and media.

Samsung a big investor in data, worked with insights firm Networked Insights, to use real-time social listening to help them keep a finger on the pulse of consumer sentiment and adjust their communications to capitalize on the web discussion about brands.

Within a couple of hours of Apple’s Tim Cook revealing their iPhone 5, Samsung reading the reaction in social channels, drafted new print, digital, and TV ads. The following week as the iPhone hit the stores, they aired TV ads mocking Apple customers queuing up for the new phone and some of its less flattering features. The commercial was a hit, and received more than 70 million views online.

They also used social listening as a real time guide to evaluate how effective their ads were with consumers by measuring what people are saying about them and what effect they’ve having on competitors’ brands. Stressing the importance of data in informing their marketing, Brian Wallace, the former VP of Marketing at Samsung, (who recently moved to Motorola to a global marketing role) said, “The data guys lead these conversations. Not the creative guys. Not the sale guys. And it’s not just analytics — it’s analysis.” He added, “[data] does not crush the art of advertising. It simply informs it — and ultimately improves it.” Samsung’s shift to a strategy of employing social data at the center was one of the key factors that assisted them to move from the number 4 mobile device manufacturer to pass the mighty Apple.

Creating a more personalized customer experience

I’m seeing a focus on data enabling marketers to create smarter, more engaged customer experiences.

I recently chaired a panel which included Sandra Zoratti, co-author of the book Precision MarketingShe cited Caesar’s Entertainment as a marketer that centralized data to better formulate its approach to marketing. They identified 0.15% of their customers that contributed to 12% of their casino revenues. This led to them employing Good Luck Ambassadors to monitor these customers. If they weren’t having a good night on the tables, they offered complimentary tickets to a show or dinner based on their known preferences to ensure they left their casinos with a positive experience.

Building a fluid organization that can capitalize on the data

Shifting to a fast moving data marketing organization isn’t just about software and strategy. It requires a shift in how the agency and clients teams work.

The Obama campaign quadrupled their data team from the previous election campaign, adding data technologists, behavioral scientists and mathematicians to crunch the data and help interpret them into actionable marketing insights.

According to Rospars, to improve speed of activation, they established a persona playbook on how the brand should speak, to allow them to delegate decision making down.

Personally, I love this shift to data-informed decision making. It is creating more adaptive, more relevant and more commercial marketing programs. We are barely scratching the surface, but it’s clear that going forward, data will be an enabler of more potent marketing.

Thanks to Brand Media Strategy


3 Ways Retailers Can Create Relevant & Personalized Promotions

March 13, 2013

Did you know, only 31%* of Americans find rewards-program communications extremely relevant and only 12%* of consumers feel that there is any value in being loyal to their favorite brands?  These numbers are a plea for better loyalty program experiences and more relevant and personalized promotions.  Here are a few suggestions  for retailers looking for some tips on how to create more relevant and personalized experiences.

1.  Avoid set it and forget it mentality
Always consider the environment, pay attention to seasonality, holidays, and special events to avoid missing our on valuable opportunities to engage your audience. The Baltimore Ravens may have won the Super Bowl this past Sunday but Oreo was the real winner. Their tweet, “You can still dunk in the dark.” sent out within minutes of the Superdome blackout garnered the cookie company over 15,540 retweets and almost 6,000 favorites. Compare this free publicity to the cost of a TV commercial that would have set the company back a cool $3.8 million. Oreo’s well-timed tweet is a great example of the value of communicating with your audience in a relevant way.

Oreo Twitter Feed

2.  Offer valuable incentives and rewards
Can you believe that over 16 billion* rewards go un-redeemed?  This says a great deal about the perceived value of loyalty programs rewards. A couple of ways that loyalty programs are going about providing more personal and relevant rewards are by offer members to exercise flexible reward and points redemption that can be used at other businesses or allowing members to donate unused rewards to causes. For example, AMEX has the MembersGive program. The program makes it possible for members to donate their unused rewards to a charity of choice. By allowing flexible reward redemption AMEX has identified a socially responsible, relevant, and personalized way of rewarding members for their loyalty.

3.  Don’t treat every customer the same
The phrase, “GILT sends a lot of emails”, is quite the understatement. Within a single minute of noon, every member of the flash sale site will receive one of 3,000 versions of GILT”s daily message – talk about extreme personalization!  Emails are custom tailored to each GILT customer, depending on purchase history, brand preferences, sales viewed,  and even size. CMO, Alexandra Wilkis-Wilson reports that applying these tactics to create more personalized email communication has contributing to a lift of 9%-10% in sales conversions.

Thanks to the guys at:

http://blog.500friends.com/2013/02/06/3-ways-retailers-can-create-relevant-personalized-promotions/#more-1546

 


Probably the Smartest Thread You’ll Read on (Social) E-Commerce…

March 13, 2013

Found this little gem at Social Commerce Today. Some really interesting ideas taken from the comments of 117 thought leaders. Some are listed below:

And for the time-pressed, here’s the speed summary of key insights/takeaways.  Brilliant.

  • The future is e-commerce; offline commerce will serve only two purposes:immediacy (stuff you need right away), and experiences (showroom, fun venues).
  • But immediacy may no longer a promise for offline commerce companies as both Amazon and eBay have announced same day delivery.
  • The role of offline lies in the value of the “showroom” and “entertainment” aspects to places like Williams Sonoma. The future of commerce is a hybrid model with (entertaining) showrooms + online fullfillment
  • The future of e-commerce is combining online and offline experiences in disruptive ways. (Chloe + Isabel, Warby Parker, Everlane, and Stylemint)
  • There is no such a thing as e-commerce any more. There’s just commerce. You can innovate in commerce with technology, but the e-commerce silo is dead/dying (mobile payments are disrupting/removing the online/offline divide).
  • The future of e-commerce is vertical integration in markets where there is significant markup in both wholesale and retail (think Shoedazzle, Bonobos, J Hilburn, Warby Parker, IndoChino).
  • Few successful e-commerce companies were started in the early 2000s, although a slew of recent new entrants appear to be getting traction - flash salessocial commercesubscription commerce and other new “content + commerce” models
  • The first wave of e-commerce was about commoditization this wave online and offline is about being a “merchant” (point of view, authority, experience etc).
  • The key equation driving e-commerce is: profit = lifetime customer value minus customer acquisition costs
  • If it has a UPC code, Amazon will beat you.”
  • Before you enter the e-commerce game, visit an Amazon warehouse.
  • E-commerce is good for two things – price and exclusives. Amazon will beat you on price, so you have to beat it on exclusives.
  • The only way to escape commoditization and catalogue commerce dominated by Amazon is to a) sell used stuff, or b) make your own products (or provide a marketplace for those things), or c) (possibly) offer customisation
  • Be wary of e-commerce businesses based on customization – they’ve  existed for a decade (cafePress, Shutterly, Vistaprint) and yet none are thriving. Customers don’t want customization, they want great brands and great design, and they want to be told what they want.
  • The e-commerce opportunity is to contribute to the e-commerce ecosystem rather than sell directly yourself; four opportunities – 1) supply chain innovation, b) marketplaces, c) e-commerce solutions for small businesses, d) mobile payments
  •  There’s room for innovation in the space as long as the ecommerce company creates value for all participants – the retailer, the supplier and the customer
  • To make money in e-commerce, you need to sell in emerging markets where there are no huge incumbents
  • Compete in an industry with a grey market, where consumers are willing to pay higher prices for reducing risk, for authenticity, and warranties
  • The opportunity is to venture into segments where Amazon won’t go (adult, arms… !)
  • The opportunity for e-commerce success is a) sell to iPad owners (iPad owners are 10x more valuable than non iPad owners), b) mobile commerce (nobody owns this yet), and b) target your customers who use social features  (3 to 4 x more valuable)
  • You can’t sell to people who know exactly what they want – Amazon owns that; focus instead either a) ‘discovery‘ (“the best place to discover the stuff you don’t know you need”) or b) deep domain expertise
  • to succeed in e-commerce, you need to sell exclusives. You can’t sell stuff that Amazon sells, Amazon will crush you
  • Amazon is not a store, it’s the world’s best supply chain and logistics company. Amazon is transforming from a retailer to a marketplace+services provider over time.
  • Domain expertise, live assistance, and overall experience are the critical success factors for success in a market where price-competitiveness and scale rule
  • Necessary (but not sufficient conditions) for e-commerce success are a)remarkable,  unique and branded experience and remarkable, unique and branded service; do what Apple, Tiffany & Co., Coach, Lululemon do in bricks and mortar commerce, but online

The Real Way to Increase Conversion Rates

March 8, 2013

Great post from the guys at Tibco (BY )

In 2012, on the two biggest shopping days of the year, Black Friday and Cyber Monday,sales grew by 26% and 20% from the previous year. Don’t believe the apocalyptic news hype, retail is not dying, not even close. Retail is evolving to giving the customer exactly what they want, when they want, and how they want it. If customers don’t want to go to your store, they shouldn’t have to. If they want to shop on their phone or tablet, you need to fully support that.

This is exactly what sellers are struggling to do – make all customer touch points equally accessible, with a completely shared experience, so customers can be engaged at the moment of their purchasing decision.

Time is a Luxury, Methods are Not

Sellers have always tried to maximize customer spending through upselling and cross-selling. Methods which were successful in the past need to be replaced with newer techniques for today’s more aware, less patient customers.

Shopping on the internet is the best example. The probability of customers checking out the offers they receive via email is lower than when they see those offers in real time on the screen when they are shopping online.

Cross-Selling at the Right Time

Online merchants use upsell techniques like providing an option to replace the customer’s selection with a higher priced and better valued item in the basket. At the check-out, the customer will see cross-sell offers with discounts and messages like “people who bought this also bought something else.” According to industry experts, cross-selling to an existing customer only costs 10% of what it would cost to acquire a new one. That cost is further reduced and much likelier to succeed if the cross-sell activity is at the moment of purchasing decision.

What is as Important as When

How you know what to cross-sell to your customer at the point of sale? Providing the same bucket of offers to all your customers will get you a very low response rate. Rent-A-Center, Inc.offers goods under flexible rental-purchase agreements that generally result in ownership of the merchandise by the customer at the conclusion of the rental period. This replaced “after-the-fact” marketing with a real-time dynamic selling vision at the store level by incorporating a 360-degree view of its customers. RAC aggregated real-time data from various touch points of customer interaction and combined the new data with historical information on customer preferences and behavior to create a comprehensive understanding of their customers. This approach enabled Rent-A-Center to provide need based upsell or cross-sell offers to every single customer across the 3,000 plus stores.

We know who our customers are. What we lacked was insight into the products they prefer, the patterns of their rental behaviors, the peculiarities of their demographics, and the changes in their lives that would drive future rentals. The more we know about the customer, the better we’ll be at offering the right products at the right place at the right time, and that should translate into rental agreements with longer life.” 

– Senior director of Data Management for Rent-A-Center

A successful cross-seller ensures that the enterprise’s critical information on customers and products not only remains consistent and current, but can also be applied in real time across locations, lines of business, and interaction touch points.

For more information, here is a webinar on “How Operational Excellence Drives Supply Demand Chain Effectiveness.”


Bring Your Own Demise [INFOGRAPHIC]

March 6, 2013

Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) is certainly not new, but its effects on security and employee behavior are still largely undetermined.  To quantify the impact of personal devices in corporate settings, Varonis conducted a short survey and compiled the results in a new research report.

The results may surprise you — more than half of respondents reported someone in their companylost a device with important company data on it, and 22% of lost devices had security implications for the company.  Moreover, 86% of employees admit to being “device obsessed,” working on their mobile device around the clock.

Enjoy, share, embed our infographic and download the full report to learn which data protection activities truly matter.

Bring Your Own Demise: A Report of the Impact of BYOD


The Fallacy of the Security No-Man’s Land

March 5, 2013

Mike Rothman of Dark Reading wrote an interesting piece, which Bruce Schneier echoed last week, arguing that security vendors are focused on the top 1,000 enterprises, leaving the meager mid-sized businesses that live beneath the Security Poverty Line to fend for themselves.  Rothman:

“These folks have a couple hundred to a couple thousand employees. That’s big enough to have real data interesting to attackers, but not big enough to have a dedicated security staff and the resources they need to really protect anything.”

I feel this argument is a tad overstated.  Think about what the No-Man’s Land theory says about the business models of security vendors—that they’re collectively and deliberately ignoring an entire forest full of deer and rabbits with hopes of nabbing a few elephants?  Sounds like a surefire way to starve to death.  (My apologies, vegetarians.)

Rothman really nails it on the head here, though:

“What folks in security no-man’s land need most of all is a security program. They need an adviser to guide them through the program. They need someone to help them prioritize what they need to do right now. ”

YES!  This is the secret sauce. But what makes this exclusive to large enterprises?  Despite not having bespoke security, it’s hard to excuse mid-market companies that don’t go after the low-hanging fruit (sorry, carnivores).

Rothman continues:

“They don’t want or need someone to do everything for them. And they certainly don’t need a shiny object to stop the attack du jour. “

The “blocking and tackling” Rothman calls for something every organization can start doing—large or small.  For unstructured data, Varonis has an entire blog series detailing precisely how companies can implement a security action plan, and Varonis will custom-tailor every step around the resources available.

By focusing on the fundamentals, we’ve seen some mid-market businesses with a few ultra-bright security and operations folks implement more comprehensive and successful IT security programs than Fortune 100s with ostensibly limitless budget and staff.


Cloud or Managed Service : What is the difference?

February 15, 2013

Firstly, cloud computing is not managed hosting. They are two completely different service layers. One refers to a compute resource ie RAM, Chip set and a host, the other to a management resource

The term cloud computing refers to the actual computing layer at a resource level. Cloud computing is generically defined as an elastic and redundant computing resource usually in a multi-tenant environment. Cloud computing and Virtulisation are both very closely related

Managed hosting refers to the managed service layer that sits on top of the computing resource layer. This management layer is generally made up of two and sometimes 3 elements:

  1. Hardware & Network management
  2. OS management including basic service management i.e. Windows, Apache, IIS etc
  3. Application management i.e MS SQL, MS Exchange, MS Dynamics etc

Then there is an additional segment to the term ‘managed hosting’ being ‘complex managed hosting’ Complex managed hosting usually refers to more complex environments that may involve application management, v-lans, load balancing, complex SAN in our case 3PAR configurations and the configurations/management of these in addition to the regular inclusions of managed hosting. Complex managed hosting is typically referring to multiple server (per project) environments rather than single server environments

If you look at Amazon Web Services (AWS) as a good example of cloud computing, they do not provide any Layer 7 management services as standard inclusions. They provide simple compute instance and that’s pretty much it. You need to perform all your own systems administration including OS, services, applications etc.

C24 is a traditionally, managed service providers (MSP) that provides the management layer on top of dedicated servers and virtulisation layers. The recent explosion of ‘cloud computing’ or cloud instances has now seen these MSP’s offer a management layer on top of ‘cloud instances’.

While people require a compute resource they will also require a management resource. Some may perform the management in-house, while others may decide to outsource the management. Most MSP’s provide both the cloud compute layer and management as a combined service.

To put cloud computing into a really simple model, it essentially takes the focus off the physical hardware layer and places the focus on a computing as a resource. Virtulisation works pretty much the same except you still have a host node. The underlying technology that most cloud computing platforms reside on is no different to traditional virtulisation without the focus on the hardware resource. Many cloud compute platforms still use as an example Citrix Xen, VMWare or Parallels as the platform on which to provide their instances, yet the instances are spread over a number of clustered hardware nodes. Cloud computing and Virtulisation still deal with the deployment of instances or virtual machines as a compute resource with zero focus on the hardware.

Many people incorrectly define cloud computing and virtulisation. They are both very similar yet different enough to deserve different definitions. Additionally many refer to items such as SaaS as cloud computing. SaaS (Software As A Service) as an example may or not be delivered via a cloud computing model. A service provider may deliver SaaS via a dedicated hardware resource which would not qualify as a cloud computing service.

C24 is a complex managed service provider as we do the whole piece from design, implementation, network installation, full system monitoring that includes the hardware, software and comms stack and delivers applications at speed globally. We truly are a specialist provider.


10 Things Your Customers Wish You Knew About Them [Infographic]

February 13, 2013

Earlier this week I shared an infographic that outlined the 6 Keys to Branding your Small Business. One of the components was related to knowing who your target audience – or customers are. You can never know too much about your customers. Understanding their likes and dislikes, shopping behavior, etc. can help you make better business decisions.

Surprisingly, there are still things that customers say they wish businesses understood about them better. Help Scout, a customer service software company has put together this infographic that highlights research related to the topic.

Here are some key takeaways:

Customers prefer knowledgeable and thought-out service, rather than having a rushed experience.
Loyalty customers are bound to stay if get them started with the program.
Consumers would rather connect with a brand emotionally than with “savings” type messages.
Everyone loves pleasant surprises!

10 things you should know about your customers infographic 10 Things Your Customers Wish You Knew About Them [Infographic]

BY ANITA PUBLISHED SEPTEMBER 19, 2012


The New Risks Facing Healthcare Providers

January 30, 2013

In a clip from the session “Beyond Med Mal: The New Risks Facing Healthcare Providers” from the 2012 PLUS International Conference, panelists Genevieve Alexander (NAS Insurance Services, Inc.) and Kieran Dempsey (Sapphire Blue, Ryan Specialty Group, LLC) discuss the costs of a data security breach in the healthcare industry.

For more on the big issues in medical professional lines, don’t miss the PLUS Medical PL Symposium, April 10 & 11 in Chicago.

The interesting figures are : Average breach $2.24 million and $194.00 cost per record breached.


PWC’s 2013 Top Ten Technology Trends for Business

January 28, 2013

In today’s highly competitive global environment, companies are looking for opportunities to minimize costs, increase efficiencies and gain competitive advantage. Business leaders across all industries are focused on IT as a way to accomplish these goals. The use of emerging, disruptive technologies such as context-aware mobile apps and enterprise social networking along with the proliferation of public and private cloud is commanding organizations to assess and manage the impact these technologies may have on their business. Leaders are required to understand, prioritize and apply these new technologies within the context of their overall business goals.

PwC recently completed the 5th Annual Digital IQ Survey. The survey is designed to assess how well companies understand the value of technology and weave IT into the fabric of their organization. For the first time, the Digital IQ survey was conducted globally and included participation from more than 1,100 respondents. Detailed below are the Top 10 Technology Trends for Business that emerged from the survey. Click on any trend to get a brief point of view from PwC’s leaders in these areas.

Read about the 2013 Top 10 Technology Trends for Business please click the link.

Simulation & Scenario Modeling
Gamification
Digital Delivery of Products & Services
Private Cloud
Big Data Mining & Analysis

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 752 other followers